A QUESTION OF VALUES
(Peter 1:13-16)
Peter opens his first letter
by summarizing the
tremendous gifts we have in
Christ: a new birth, a
living hope, and an
inheritance that simply
cannot be lost (vv 3-4).
Over the next ten verses,
Peter praises God with joy
and thanksgiving for the
hope and salvation we have
in Christ, which the
prophets searched out and
the angels long to look
into.
Then we come to vv.
13-16, where we read,
“Therefore, prepare your
minds for action; be
self-controlled; set your
hope fully on the grace to
be given you when Jesus
Christ is revealed. As
obedient children, do not
conform to the evil desires
you had when you lived in
ignorance. But just as he
who called you is holy, so
be holy in all you do; for
it is written: ‘Be holy,
because I am holy.’”
“Therefore, prepare your
minds for action.” Why do we
need to prepare our minds,
and for what kind of fight?
Paul says in Ephesians that
our battle is not against
flesh and blood but against
principalities and powers.
Those who align themselves
with Christ are in the midst
of a spiritual battle.
“Prepare your minds for
action; be self-controlled.”
The Amplified Bible puts it
this way: “So brace up your
minds; be sober
(circumspect; morally
alert).” With what do we
prepare, or brace up our
minds? What do we take up in
order to be self-controlled
and morally alert? I believe
Peter is saying here that we
need to prepare our minds
with God’s truth.
When Martin Luther was
accused of heresy, he
declared to his
interrogators, “Unless I am
convinced by sacred
Scripture or by evident
reason, I cannot recant for
my conscience is held
captive by the Word of God…”
and later, “Here I stand!”
Luther’s mind belonged to
God’s Word and to his truth,
and Luther’s conscience
would not let him turn away
from it. Truth was seen as
absolute and to be obeyed.
How different things are
today. Conversely, our
culture says, “Truth! What
Truth? You mean what you
perceive as the truth? What
is true for you is not
necessarily true for me.”
Our “new” modern
worldview stems from
Immanuel Kant. In his
“Critique of Pure Reason,”
Kant states that we cannot
know anything about God
through rational deduction
or empirical investigation.
In other words, there is a
barrier to our knowledge
about God through which the
powers of our reason and
sense perception cannot
reach. So for Kant, the only
way one could “know” God was
through some sort of leap of
faith. It is this reasoning
that has formed the
worldview held by so many
today.
However, I find it
interesting that those who
consider truth relative and
moral absolutes obsolete
seem to set aside those
convictions when acts of
evil steal the spotlight
(such as the recent burst of
school violence in the
U.S.), because those acts
remind us that men do not
commit evil in a vacuum.
More often than not, there
is a victim, and no one
dares suggest, “Well, it
seemed right to the
murderer…”
Recently Florida
Representative Mark Foley’s
sexually suggestive IMs and
emails to former male pages
have been splashed all
across the media, prompting
his resignation and a
federal investigation.
Through his attorney, Foley
has also announced that he
was molested as a teen, and
is gay. I find it
interesting that Foley’s
first statement when these
allegations were made public
expressed his remorse for
the harm done to his family.
He apologized to his family
for the hurt and pain caused
them by his choices and
actions. Self-control is for
the protection of others as
much as it is for the
preservation of self.
These are extreme, highly
publicized examples of those
who, as far as we know, do
not claim to follow Christ.
But Peter’s words were to
the church, and the
heartbreaking reality is
that too often we watch our
own friends and ministry
partners (or even ourselves)
fail to be “self-controlled,
sober, circumspect, morally
alert” and the results are
devastating.
I think it’s important
for each of us to maybe have
a “Luther Moment” in our
lives once in awhile. To
come back to our own
“Wittenberg door” where we
declare what we know to be
true, that our conscience
will not let us recant, and
to affirm, “Here I stand.”
Let’s prepare our minds for
action with the truth of
God.
Back To Top
Faith
is not
pretending the something is
real when deep down you
don’t believe it. That’s
fear, not faith.
Faith is not an
anti-intellectual, warm
feel-good that requires you
to check your mind at the
door. That’s feeling,
not faith.
Faith is not a
stained glass escapism; it’s
not hiding from reality or
ignoring the world around
you. That’s fluff,
not faith.
Faith is not a
motivational seminar telling
you to picture a better
future. That’s fad,
not faith.
Faith is not a
positive mental attitude;
it’s not ignoring the pain
and embracing optimism.
That’s foolishness,
not faith.
Faith is believing the
Word of God and acting upon
is, no matter how I feel,
because God promises a good
result.
- HBC 2006; Church on
a Mission: Studies in Acts
Back To Top
Direct Hit: Aiming Real
Leaders at the Mission Field
by Paul D. Borden
Abingdon Press 2006
(Reviewed by David Korb)
I
always take a minute to read
the “endorsements” listed in
the first few pages of a new
book. I was quite surprised,
then, that although the
first few pages of this book
contain blurbs of praise
from people I highly respect
and whose wisdom I value, I
had a totally different
response to this book than
did the endorsers. I feel
like this book is more about
“selling widgets” than
leading a congregation into
a Spirit-directed,
Christ-centered missional
passion.
Borden asserts in Chapter
1 that “the primary skill
required for strong
leadership in the church is
the ability to use words.
…Outstanding leaders
understand that they have
signed up for a 24/7 task.
Every spoken word, every
phone call, every e-mail,
every verbal interaction
(formal or informal) with
people in the congregation
reflects an overall
communication strategy for
change. If we lead change
only through formal
presentations or meetings,
then we have unclear
thinking about the nature of
the task. Every venue, every
day—no matter how seemingly
insignificant—ought to be a
specific tactic in our
overall communication
strategy. …The skill is not
found only in the words. The
quality is found in the
intonation, the body
language, the eye contact,
and more, when helping
people see we are excited
about a new vision.”
Borden feels that the key
to a healthy church is
strong pastoral leadership,
and the most important skill
for pastoral leaders to
possess and hone is their
ability to communicate. In
this book, he outlines how a
pastor might become this
tremendous communicator in
order to lead his
congregation through a
process of change. Borden
ends the first chapter with
this charge: “God calls you
to lead change not only with
individuals but also with
groups of people, called
congregations. …Therefore,
communicate well to lead
well.” The author’s emphasis
on tactics and strategies to
be employed by one leader
over a group of people with
an implied commitment to
heavy top-down leadership
left me feeling unsettled.
Leaders certainly need to
have vision, but Borden’s
“nuts and bolts” approach to
casting that vision before a
congregation feels too
mechanistic.
Beyond Duty: A Passion for
Christ, a Heart for Mission
by Tim Dearborn
InterVarsity Press 1998
(Reviewed by David Korb)
Beyond Duty provides a
needed counterbalance to the
book reviewed above.
Dearborn writes, “God’s
church falters from
exhaustion because
Christians erroneously think
that God has given them a
mission to perform in the
world. The Father, the God
of mission, has given his
church to the world. It is
not the church of God that
has a mission in the world,
but the God of the church
who has a mission in the
world.” He continues, “The
church does not exist for
mission. It exists for the
Lord Jesus Christ. To set
mission before the church as
its essential reason for
existence is to risk
focusing its devotion on an
idol. In our age of
human-centered pragmatism,
where our focus is easily
fixed on the fruitfulness of
our own labor and where our
worth is measured by our
successes and failures, we
dare not make something we
do the justification of our
existence.” Dearborn reminds
the reader that the call of
mission is commitment not to
a task but to a person,
Jesus Christ.
I highly recommend this
book. It offers a refreshing
reminder of the clear call
of Scripture to have an
effect upon society not
because of the tasks we
perform but due to the love
of Christ emanating from our
lives.
Back To Top